Looking for the best football teams to bet on over 2.5 goals? Find here all the teams that generate the most over 2.5 goals.
Check out the teams that generate the most over 2.5 goals. See our ranked list of the top football teams in the world that make games with more than 2.5 goals with details of game numbers and the average for each league.
1
|
Team | League | Games | 2.5 | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2
|
1 | Tampines |
Singapore – Premier League
|
16 | 16 | 100% | ||
3
|
2 | Lyngby | Denmark – 1st Division | 7 | 7 | 100% | ||
4
|
3 | A. Lustenau | Austria – 2. Liga | 6 | 6 | 100% | ||
5
|
4 | Varnsdorf | Czech Rep – FNL | 6 | 6 | 100% | ||
6
|
5 | L. Mikulas | Slovakia – Fortuna Liga | 6 | 6 | 100% | ||
7
|
6 | Ch. Odessa | Ukraine – Premier League | 6 | 6 | 100% | ||
8
|
7 | Sigma Olomouc | Czech Rep – 1. Liga | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
9
|
8 | Reading | England – Championship | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
10
|
9 | Ipswich | England – League 1 | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
11
|
10 | York | England – NL North | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
12
|
11 | Eastbourne Boro | England – NL South | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
13
|
12 | Welling | England – NL South | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
14
|
13 | Kiel | Germany – 2. Bundesliga | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
15
|
14 | Debrecen | Hungary – NB I | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
16
|
15 | Paks | Hungary – NB I | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
17
|
16 | Clyde | Scotland – League 1 | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
18
|
17 | Dumbarton | Scotland – League 1 | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||
19
|
18 | Merthyr Town |
England – Sou League South
|
5 | 5 | 100% | ||
20
|
19 | Lowestoft |
England – Sou League Central
|
5 | 5 | 100% | ||
21
|
20 | Throttur | Iceland – 1. Deild | 20 | 19 | 95% | ||
22
|
21 | Tanjong Pagar |
Singapore – Premier League
|
17 | 16 | 94% | ||
23
|
22 | Levadia | Estonia – Meistriliiga | 21 | 19 | 90% | ||
24
|
23 | Noah | Latvia – Virsliga | 18 | 16 | 89% | ||
25
|
24 | J. Wilstermann | Bolivia – Primera Division | 17 | 15 | 88% | ||
26
|
25 | Geylang |
Singapore – Premier League
|
17 | 15 | 88% | ||
27
|
26 | Etar | Bulgaria – Vtora Liga | 8 | 7 | 88% | ||
28
|
27 | Liverpool M. |
Uruguay – Primera Division
|
15 | 13 | 87% | ||
29
|
28 | Viktoria Koln | Germany – 3. Liga | 7 | 6 | 86% | ||
30
|
29 | Sp. Subotica | Serbia – Super Liga | 7 | 6 | 86% | ||
31
|
30 | TSC Backa Topola | Serbia – Super Liga | 7 | 6 | 86% | ||
32
|
31 | Olafsvik | Iceland – 1. Deild | 20 | 17 | 85% | ||
33
|
32 | Selfoss | Iceland – 1. Deild | 20 | 17 | 85% | ||
34
|
33 | Grotta | Iceland – 1. Deild | 19 | 16 | 84% | ||
35
|
34 | Sturm Graz | Austria – Bundesliga | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
36
|
35 | Wolfsberger AC | Austria – Bundesliga | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
37
|
36 | Dornbirn | Austria – 2. Liga | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
38
|
37 | Eupen | Belgium – Pro League | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
39
|
38 | CSKA 1948 Sofia | Bulgaria – Parva Liga | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
40
|
39 | Pardubice | Czech Rep – 1. Liga | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
41
|
40 | Vlasim | Czech Rep – FNL | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
42
|
41 | OFK Petrovac |
Montenegro – First League
|
6 | 5 | 83% | ||
43
|
42 | Wisla | Poland – Ekstraklasa | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
44
|
43 | Akhmat Grozny | Russia – Premier League | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
45
|
44 | Arsenal Tula | Russia – Premier League | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
46
|
45 | Cukaricki | Serbia – Super Liga | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
47
|
46 | Partizan | Serbia – Super Liga | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
48
|
47 | Desna | Ukraine – Premier League | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
49
|
48 | Dnipro-1 | Ukraine – Premier League | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
50
|
49 | Mariupol | Ukraine – Premier League | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||
51
|
50 | San Jose | Bolivia – Primera Division | 17 | 14 | 82% | ||
52
|
51 | Viking | Norway – Eliteserien | 17 | 14 | 82% | ||
53
|
52 | Balestier Khalsa |
Singapore – Premier League
|
17 | 14 | 82% | ||
54
|
53 |
Beijing Technology
|
China – Jia League | 20 | 16 | 80% | ||
55
|
54 | Grindavik | Iceland – 1. Deild | 20 | 16 | 80% | ||
56
|
55 | Godoy Cruz |
Argentina – Primera Division
|
10 | 8 | 80% | ||
57
|
56 | Pirin Blagoevgrad | Bulgaria – Parva Liga | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
58
|
57 | West Brom | England – Championship | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
59
|
58 | Chester | England – NL North | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
60
|
59 | Curzon Ashton | England – NL North | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
61
|
60 | Gateshead | England – NL North | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
62
|
61 | Gloucester | England – NL North | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
63
|
62 | Southport | England – NL North | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
64
|
63 | Spennymoor | England – NL North | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
65
|
64 | Bath | England – NL South | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
66
|
65 | Dartford | England – NL South | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
67
|
66 | Dorking | England – NL South | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
68
|
67 | Hemel Hempstead | England – NL South | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
69
|
68 | Oxford City | England – NL South | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
70
|
69 | Sete | France – National | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
71
|
70 | Darmstadt | Germany – 2. Bundesliga | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
72
|
71 | Paderborn | Germany – 2. Bundesliga | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
73
|
72 | Rostock | Germany – 2. Bundesliga | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
74
|
73 | Schalke | Germany – 2. Bundesliga | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
75
|
74 | Almere | Holland – Eerste Divisie | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
76
|
75 | Den Haag | Holland – Eerste Divisie | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
77
|
76 | Maastricht | Holland – Eerste Divisie | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
78
|
77 | Telstar | Holland – Eerste Divisie | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
79
|
78 | Kisvarda | Hungary – NB I | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
80
|
79 | Ujpest | Hungary – NB I | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
81
|
80 | Zalaegerszeg | Hungary – NB I | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
82
|
81 | Shkendija |
North Macedonia – First League
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
83
|
82 | Zaglebie | Poland – Ekstraklasa | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
84
|
83 | Stirling | Scotland – League 2 | 5 | 4 | 80% | ||
85
|
84 | Lausanne |
Switzerland – Super League
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
86
|
85 | Luzern |
Switzerland – Super League
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
87
|
86 | St. Gallen |
Switzerland – Super League
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
88
|
87 | Zurich |
Switzerland – Super League
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
89
|
88 | Aarau |
Switzerland – Challenge League
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
90
|
89 | Wil |
Switzerland – Challenge League
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
91
|
90 | Xamax |
Switzerland – Challenge League
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
92
|
91 | Yverdon |
Switzerland – Challenge League
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
93
|
92 | Farnborough |
England – Sou League South
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
94
|
93 | Harrow |
England – Sou League South
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
95
|
94 | Hayes & Yeading |
England – Sou League South
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
96
|
95 | Hendon |
England – Sou League South
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
97
|
96 | Poole |
England – Sou League South
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
98
|
97 | Swindon S |
England – Sou League South
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
99
|
98 | Taunton |
England – Sou League South
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
100
|
99 | Tiverton |
England – Sou League South
|
5 | 4 | 80% | ||
101
|
100 | Biggleswade Town |
England – Sou League Central
|
5 | 4 | 80% |